theLiberty
|
TheLiberty
is a local paper for Dublin's south inner city
|
|||
February 2001 |
||||
An
Taisce objects to Georges St 'monolith'
|
||||
|
||||
By Aoife Stokes | ||||
An
Taisce, the national organisation responsible for the protection of Irish
heritage, has filed an objection against planning permission currently being
sought for the development of existing properties on South Great George's
St.
The planning application has been made by Chartered Property Holdings and includes a range of building developments including a planned pedestrian route through Dublin Castle in conjunction with works to be carried out by the Office of Public Works (OPW). The objections raised by An Taisce relate solely to the developments of neighbouring buildings, Castle House and Wicklow House, 78/83 and 84/89 South Great George's Street respectively. The application seeks to add two stories on to what An Taisce have described in a letter to Dublin Corporation's Planning Department as "an already monolithic building". However the application with plans, by architects John O'Keefe and Associates, cite historical reasons for the need to alter these premises explaining that these buildings were designed by an English firm in Birmingham in the early to mid 1970's.
"It is possible that the buildings were designed for a completely different site (probably in England) and were transposed to Ireland and fitted in to George's Street Great South. "The building's design make no concession to its actual location on a curved sloping Victorian Street." Whilst An Taisce recognise that the 1970's demolition and subsequent
developments to South Great George's St were "a lesson learned,"
they do add that the pre-1970's tract of buildings "generated a regularity
and evenness which cannot be recaptured". Many of the development proposals were discussed with the OPW in the pre-application stage. This resulted in the OPW setting about developing proposals of their own for the new pedestrian route, which will include the formation of a new circular courtyard. The new route, part of which is a proposed two-storey arcade, would be
fitted with ramps and steps to facilitate access to its different levels. |
||||